A Philosophical Exploration Published: June 19, Charles L. Reviewed by Ernesto V. Garcia, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Forgiveness:
September In high school I decided I was going to study philosophy in college. I had several motives, some more honorable than others. One of the less honorable was to shock people.
College was regarded as job training where I grew up, so studying philosophy seemed an impressively impractical thing to do. Sort of like slashing holes in your clothes or putting a safety pin through your ear, which were other forms of impressive impracticality then just coming into fashion.
But I had some more honest motives as well. I thought studying philosophy would be a shortcut straight to wisdom. All the people majoring in other things would just end up with a bunch of domain knowledge.
I would be learning what was really what. I'd tried to read a few philosophy books. Not recent ones; you wouldn't find those in our high school library.
But I tried to read Plato and Aristotle.
I doubt I believed I understood them, but they sounded like they were talking about something important. I assumed I'd learn what in college. The summer before senior year I took some college classes. I learned a lot in the calculus class, but I didn't learn much in Philosophy And yet my plan to study philosophy remained intact.
It was my fault I hadn't learned anything. I hadn't read the books we were assigned carefully enough. I'd give Berkeley's Principles of Human Knowledge another shot in college.
Anything so admired and so difficult to read must have something in it, if one could only figure out what. Twenty-six years later, I still don't understand Berkeley. I have a nice edition of his collected works. Will I ever read it? The difference between then and now is that now I understand why Berkeley is probably not worth trying to understand.
I think I see now what went wrong with philosophy, and how we might fix it. Words I did end up being a philosophy major for most of college. It didn't work out as I'd hoped.
I didn't learn any magical truths compared to which everything else was mere domain knowledge.Free Essay: Choices that people make have a giant place in their lives.
Most of us consider that we do these choices freely, that we have free will to make. Postmodern Philosophy. Postmodern Philosophy – Introduction Richard Rorty summarizes Postmodern philosophy well, “We [should] give up the correspondence theory of truth, and start treating moral and scientific beliefs as tools for achieving greater human happiness, rather than as representations of the intrinsic nature of reality.” 1 The philosophical ideas of Postmodernism divide.
Free will is not the same as freedom of action. Freedom of action refers to things that prevent a willed action from being realized.
For example, being in prison means you are not free to go out with your friends on Friday night to the local bar. Emmanuel Levinas (–) has exerted a profound influence on 20th-century continental philosophy.
This anthology, including Levinas's key philosophical texts over a period of more than forty years, provides an ideal introduction to his thought and offers insights into his most innovative ideas. Hermeneutics (/ ˌ h ɜːr m ə ˈ nj uː t ɪ k s /) is the theory and methodology of interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts..
Modern hermeneutics includes both verbal and non-verbal communication as well as semiotics, presuppositions, and initiativeblog.comeutics has been broadly applied in the humanities, especially. Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration.
is a masterful treatment of a central issue in moral philosophy..
Well-written, penetrating, and rich in details, this book discusses a number of related topics including interpersonal forgiveness, political apology, pardon, and civic reconciliation.